"safe and effective"

Is there a single drug on the market which meets this description? I have my doubts. Permit me to explain why.

My friends, I have remained silent for a long time. It is simply too depressing for me and too overwhelming—everything that has been happening in the world lately, the outrageous level of deception, all of the harm that is being done knowingly and willfully by these remorseless servants of the devil whom we stupidly allow to occupy positions of power.

The lies do not begin with the scamdemic. They began long before. The medical establishment has been lying to us since the day we were born. Since the first poison injection we received. Before we could give consent. Before we could understand the crime that was being committed against us. Before we could protest or attempt to defend ourselves against this terrifying form of medical violence. In addition to the first poison injection, male infants in America are subjected to another form of violence: circumcision. Another appalling crime perpetrated on defenseless babies by the collective sadism of the American State and its diabolical medical minions. And yes, they have a lot of lies at their disposal which they use to justify that crime too.

It doesn’t require any special education to understand how harmful are the harmful things which doctors do, to understand that many of their actions are wholly criminal. It simply requires common sense and compassion. But to oppose the system which has been put in place requires great courage, because you are opposing coercive powers that want to subjugate you and scar you and render you submissive to their will for life.

But there is another problem: people trust authority, they trust that what they have been repeatedly told by authority figures is true. If the authorities call the violence and coercion “good,” then the people come to see it as good, trust that it is good, and do not call it violence and coercion any longer. So they become complicit in a crime without even being conscious of it. This is why parents permit the crime of poison injections, and permit the crime of circumcision, to be perpetrated against their own children instead of trying to protect them. Parents may even internalize the attitudes of the doctors who commit these crimes, and become active participants in the violence themselves. Ultimately, that is all that child abuse is: parents treating their own children as coercively and violently as the State treats all of the people who live under its power. Violence is built into the very system, which is why it is continues to thrive generation after generation. It is ironic to see a parent persecuted for child abuse. Parents guilty of child abuse are no more criminal than the State itself, which has taught them to act like this by providing countless models of violent behavior for them to imitate. Their behavior is no different than “officially approved” behavior, no different from the behavior of politicians, of doctors, and of other authority figures who possess power over others and abuse it in the name of what is “good” or what is “necessary.”

To understand the full extent of the violence perpetrated by the medical establishment day after day in the name of what is “good” and what is “necessary” we need to go back much further, to a time before the scamdemic. Because it is not with the scamdemic that the lies begin. It is all of the lying they did beforehand which laid the foundation for the scamdemic and made it possible.

Recently someone asked me: “if big pharma did not do enough research on these latest ‘vaccines’ which have done so much damage to people, how do we know that prescription drugs generally have been adequately researched, and how do we know they will not have equally damaging effects?”

This is an excellent question, and I was very glad to hear someone asking it. But at the same time it concerned me that it had never occurred to this person to ask that question before. Only now did he seem to be considering that pharmaceutical drugs in general might be harmful. He must have heard about many cases of drugs injuring and killing people. He must have some awareness of the harm drugs do. But his question makes it clear that he thinks that safe and effective drugs could be brought to market, if only proper research was done. This is not the case. There has never been and never will be a “safe and effective” drug. All drugs are inherently harmful and the only thing they do effectively is harm the human body.

IN an attempt to explain why I would first like to look a little closer at these two words: “safe” and “effective.”

What would an “effective” drug do? I think we can all agree that a truly effective drug would be one that would heal or cure the patient. But drugs are poisons that threaten the body’s survival and far from benefiting from them the body rejects them and attempts to expel them. No poison possesses curative powers, and the body knows this. Try asking a doctor prescribing a drug the following question: “does this drug have the power to cure me of the illness for which it is being prescribed?” No doctor in the world is so dishonest or so deluded as to answer that question affirmatively. Doctors know that drugs do not heal. Doctors know that drugs do not cure. That is why they do not talk about performing a drug “cure” on their patients; they talk about preforming a drug “treatment.” We are to be “treated” with the drug they have prescribed. And according to the scheme devised by the pharmaceutical cartel, the ideal treatment is one that never ends—a treatment that lasts a lifetime. They want patients who will take their drugs daily—or at the very least on a recurring basis—for the rest of their lives. Anti-depressants are to be taken every day for the rest of your life. Statins are to be taken every day for the rest of your life. Eyedrops for glaucoma are to be put in the eyes every day for the rest of your life. Eczema creams are to be applied to the skin for the rest of your life. Asthma inhalers are to be used for the rest of your life. I could go on, but you get the idea. That is what a treatment is: something that goes on, ideally until the day you die. And let us not delude ourselves: we will die much sooner as a result of the very treatment we submit to, because poison cannot have beneficial effects on the body, it can have only harmful effects.

What kind of a drug would a “safe” drug be? This we can answer more simply. A safe drug would be drug that was beneficial rather than harmful. A safe drug would consist of wholly non-toxic substances. However, drugs are inherently toxic and inherently harmful to the human body, hence a safe drug is an impossibility, a contradiction in terms. The effects of drugs demonstrate this to be true. They are often called “side effects.” But drugs do not have “side effects.” Every effect a drug has on the body is a direct effect of the drug, a direct effect of poisoning. The symptoms we experience as a result of taking a poison are our body’s reaction to the poison, its reaction to a substance which it immediately recognizes as harmful and does everything in its power to expel. Our body wants to protect us from the very substance the doctors are telling us we need to take. Every discomfort we experience after taking a drug, every pain we feel, every injury we suffer, is important information about the effect that drug is having on our body. It is information about how that drug is damaging our organism. We ignore such information at our own peril.

Why then are the direct effects drugs have on the body categorized as “side effects”? To manipulate our perception, to distort our view of reality. Doctors want us to ignore those effects, to discount them, to see them as something peripheral and unimportant. To further promote this impression they like to call them “infrequent” or “rare” and may react with surprise when a patient reports one of these effects. This is just one deception that misleads us about how drugs work. Another is the myth the medical establishment promotes that drugs act on “parts” of the body, rather than on the WHOLE body. Hence they classify a drug as a liver drug, a heart drug, a kidney drug, a skin drug, or a lung drug. Such descriptions are extremely misleading. Every drug is a whole body drug. Every drug influences and affects the whole body.

If we react very severely to a drug, we are lucky: we will stop using it immediately, and so we will be saved from the damage it would have done to our health. Someone else might go on to take that drug for ten years, and at a certain degree of toxicity his body will be so weakened it will snap and he will end up hospitalized, permanently injured, possibly dead. But because he was given a heart drug, if he did not die of a heart problem, but of some other disease, the doctors will exonerate themselves of all blame. At least his heart didn’t give out! See, the drug worked! Did a man taking a “heart” drug die of kidney failure? Too bad. He should have been on kidney drugs too. The doctor bears no responsibility for the destruction of his kidneys, nor does the drug company. All of the organs of our body are sperate from each other and there is absolutely no interaction between them. Every problem with one organ can be treated in isolation from all the other organs. The organs of the human body are like separate planets in the solar system separated by vast expanses of empty space. That is what drug makers and doctors would like us to believe. A heart drug cleverly goes directly to the heart and knows it should leave everything else alone. Never mind that long list of worrying symptoms we see on the insert! Those are mere “side effects”! For example:

• nausea

• stomachache

• diarrhea

• unbearable itchiness

• rashes

• exhaustion

• dizziness and vertigo

• weakness

• shortness of breath

• depression

• flushing

• swelling of the ankles and feet

• muscle cramps

• headache

Naturally, I have confined myself to listing the least worrisome side effects which “heart drugs” have. It is not my intention to terrify you. Everyone should do exactly what his doctor tells him to do. Ignore me. What do I know? I am a mere philosopher of medicine. Nevertheless, I encourage you to ask yourself very seriously: why is my “heart” medication having so many different effects on such a wide variety of bodily systems? What exactly is it doing to those bodily systems to cause those symptoms? Is the discomfort and pain I feel an indication the drug is doing something beneficial in my body, or something harmful?

But let’s go back to all of this research pharmaceutical companies claim to do, or are at least supposed to do. What is the point of it, in the light of all I have said above? It is simply theatre. How else can drug approval by the FDA be made to appear legitimate? They want to promote the illusion that medicine “scientific.” But medicine is not a science. It is not based on scientific principles. Even a total idiot can verify experimentally with very little effort that poison does not benefit anyone’s health. But poison is what doctors prescribe for every disease they diagnose. Is this scientific?

In fact medicine operates in direct contradiction to the principles it is supposed to be based on. For example one of the first principles a doctor is supposed to abide by is “do no harm” but as we have already seen all of the methods doctors use to treat disease are are inherently harmful to the human organism. Poisons are harmful to the body. Surgery is also harmful to the body, and permanently compromises the body by doing irreparable damage to its natural structure. But drugging and cutting are modern medicine’s only methods of treatment. That is how it addresses every problem. And in emergency situations surgery really is necessary, it really is good. But how many necessary surgeries do you think are performed each year in comparison to the number of totally needless ones, that end up doing more harm than good?

It is very true that you can “scientifically prove” that a certain combination of noxious chemicals suppresses some kind of bodily symptom or has a suppressive effect on some bodily process. But I, as a doctor, cannot prove that such suppression is desirable or helpful. I cannot prove that the drug I prescribe can heal the disease it has supposedly been made for. I cannot prove that this drug has curative powers, and I cannot prove that this drug is beneficial to health rather than harmful to it. So why would I, as a doctor, whose first principle is to do no harm, tell people to take that drug? And why would I, as a drug maker, sell that drug, which no doctor can with a good conscience prescribe for the improvement of any human being’s health? All medical research boils down to making drug companies look good, and making noxious combinations of chemicals look like an excellent and needful thing, so that people will buy these deadly products in the belief they are helpful are beneficial. But in fact they are inherently harmful, and that the yare inherently harmful is something drug companies know better than anyone else. They have an exhaustive knowledge of all the harmful effects of every drug they sell. They know much more about how harmful these drugs are then they will ever publicly admit—though sometimes, many years later, after the damage has been done, they are forced to admit they knew the dangers of the drug from the beginning but concealed this knowledge out of self-interest.

Once we understand that all drugs are poisons, and that no drug can be called safe or effective precisely because it is poison, everything is clear, everything simple. For then we also understand that no amount of “drug research” is sufficient to justify the manufacture, sale, and prescription of any drug.

Research is an essential part of the marketing program of pharmaceutical companies. They can prove lots of things stuff that is irrelevant to the main issue, but the one thing they cannot prove is the only thing they need to prove: that drugs are healthful rather than harmful, healing rather than damaging, curative rather than destructive. If they cannot prove this, do you really care what else they can prove? Are you going to allow yourself to be convinced, if they can’t prove this? Let them do as much research as they like. Until they can prove with that research that any inherently harmful substance is safe for human consumption, they have proved nothing at all.

No drug is safe. Not even a single dose of any drug. We can take that drug of course, and we can survive many poisoning events while taking it. But that doesn’t mean we aren’t being poisoned, and it doesn’t mean we won’t pay the price for our choices if we continue far enough down that toxic path.

Here is the basic fact: the body doesn't want to be poisoned. Every time we are exposed to poison or expose ourselves to it by injection or ingestion, the burden of toxicity on the body increases. The health of the body will always suffer degradation as a result of poisoning. It will always reject poison and try to expel poison that has been ingested or injected into it.

To understand this better let’s think about how the body reacts to a different sort of poison : alcohol. (And by the way, if it baffles you that so many harmful drugs remain on the market, and how many people willingly take them, consider how many other poisons are on the market and how many people willingly consume those. Alcohol is a poison that is on sale everywhere. It is widely consumed by large numbers of people. Some people consume it with every meal, and often the meal itself is poisonous because it is made up exclusively of processed foods which the body isn’t designed to digest and absorb and which it responds to like an assault.)

Alcohol is a much beloved poison. It is not beneficial, it is harmful, but it is very profitable to the food magnates who make it and sell it. If you are not selling pharmaceutical drugs and you want to get into the poisoning racket, the next best line of business is definitely the alcohol business.

And what is the result of consuming alcohol? If we consume it moderately, we poison ourselves slowly. If we consume it excessively, we poison ourselves quickly. Perhaps in the first case we will suffer from many bodily ills we do not understand because the state of our body is so toxic; in the second case, we may actually die of chlorosis. And if we drink an excessive quantity of alcohol within a short time? Then we begin to vomit uncontrollably. There is name for this: ALCOHOL POISONING. The expression is redundant, because alcohol is a poison. All alcohol consumption is “alcohol poisoning.” But when we begin vomiting uncontrollably, then we actually finally recognize how poisonous it is. Our body has been overwhelmed by such a concentrated dose of this poison that it is doing everything in its power to keep us alive by expelling it.

Yet the medical myth-machine is busy churning out gems like the following: “it is the dose that makes the poison.” I am sure almost everyone has heard this. The medical men began drumming it into our brains as soon as we were born. Is it simply that these men lack logic, that they are unable to think coherently and rationally? No. They know that they are lying—but like all liars, they are often the first to swallow the lie. They start by lying to themselves. But it’s time to expose the truth. “Poisonous” is a quality. A substance either has this quality or it does not. Mercury is a poison. Water is not a poison (unless it is contaminated with something which is a poison, like, for example, fluoride). A substance that is poisonous is poisonous in any amount. Mercury doesn’t become poisonous or cease to be poisonous simply as a result of increasing or diminishing the dose. Mercury is always poisonous. It is inherently poisonous. And it is one of the most poisonous substances we know of. But that doesn’t stop doctors from filling people’s teeth with it, or putting it in vaccines and other medications. In fact mercury was the “original medicine” doctors prescribed. Back in the day they promoted it as a sort of panacea. Mercury was good for just about everything. Or at least that’s what doctors said. So you shouldn’t be surprised if mercy is still used today in many medical applications. To stop using it would be to admit guilt, to admit wrongdoing, to admit they are responsible for injuring and killing countless people. Now, what is true of mercury is true of alcohol as well. A single drop of alcohol is a single drop of poison. A pint of alcohol is a pint of poison. The nature of the substance doesn’t change based on the quantity of the substance. This medical lie that poison is a matter of quantity rather than quality is meant justify unjustifiable methods of treatment. How pathetic that they need to resort to sophistry like this to trick people into using their noxious products!

If we were a pharmaceutical company we would label the vomiting induced by excessive alcohol consumption a “severe side effect” of alcohol. Of course alcohol has many other side effects, for example “massive headache.” When we label such poisoning events “side effects” it becomes immediately clear how ridiculous the medical idea of “side effects” is—because everyone knows that vomiting isn’t a “side effect” of drinking alcohol—it is reaction to alcohol poisoning. But many people don’t know that vomiting induced by the medications they are taking is precisely the same thing.

If we understand the body’s reaction to alcohol, we understand its reaction to drugs as a whole. It doesn’t matter what the drug is. The body reacts to all poisons in precisely the same way: it tries as hard as it can to expel them and thereby protect us from them. But it doesn’t always succeed, and at some point it is too weak to mount a defense. If the dose of poison is high enough and the body is lacking in vitality because of previous poisoning events and general internal toxicity, the body will be totally overwhelmed, it will be unable to defend itself, and permanent injury, fatal disease, or sudden death may result.

Everyone knows that people who “overdose” on drugs can be permanently injured or killed as a result. But what very few people understand is that the continual use of a drug day after day is just a slower method of “overdosing.” It is a gradual approach to killing ourselves. Daily use of the same poison is a way of overdosing very carefully, very gently. We are still going to be harmed, possibly permanently injured, possibly even killed as a result of taking so much of the drug, it is just going to take a lot longer because we are consuming it at a slower rate, in smaller doses. But at some point poison always overwhelms the body. At some point our vital force is totally depleted. When that happens most people wish they had never started taking the drug they were prescribed—but it is too late.

This is why the “name” of the poison or the category in which it is placed is irrelevant. The poison might be what they call a “vaccine.” It might be wine or beer. It might be tobacco. It might be aspirin. It might be the osteoporosis drug called Reclast. All of them have the power to injure or kill you, in sufficient amounts, or with sufficient exposure, because that is what poisons do. Depending on the vitality of our body and its ability to expel them, we will be injure. Some will be harmed sooner, others later, but there is no free lunch.

Every drug that comes to market is labelled "safe and effective.” The companies that make them will tell you this. The FDA will tell you this. But the important fact to pay attention to is not the marketing slogan but the fact that despite this slogan millions are injured and killed by these safe and effective drugs. Many safe and effective drugs are pulled from the market by the FDA after they have injured and killed very large numbers of people, after it is too late, after the damage has been done. And by the time a drug is pulled a lot of damage has been done. Because those who profit from drugs will deny it and downplay it for as long as they possibly can—for years, for decades, if possible. Accutane, a chemotherapy drug rebranded as an acne drug, is still on the market. Chemotherapy drugs are the most toxic class of drugs in existence. As I write this, this chemo drug is being handed out like candy to adolescents by dermatologists. Even when they are forced to pull a drug, they will never admit that the drug did harm. We have to look at their actions, not listen to their words. They are pulling the drug—that action contains the truth about the drug. The rest is just theatre, play-acting, story-telling, the clever strategies criminals use to make themselves look innocent and that liars use to make themselves look honest.

But what about the poisons that aren’t pulled from the market, the poisons that have remained on the market for decades: surely they safe? Aspirin is still on the market, so it must be safe, right? I wish it were. In fact, every time we take an aspirin we are poisoning ourselves. The herb that aspirin is derived from, “willow bark,” is a toxin. Aspirin is the synthetic version of this natural toxin. Aspirin is more toxic than plain old willow bark, because it is more powerful. Take enough of it, or take it frequently enough, and you will inevitably be injured by aspirin. Ignore that injury and keep taking aspirin - and eventually it will kill you. Yes, this safe and effective drug will eventually kill you. What caused the so-called “Spanish Flu” of 1918, which we have all been led to believe was caused by a “virus”? No one knows for sure, but aspirin poisoning and vaccine poisoning, either in isolation or in conjunction, are very likely candidates. But how convenient for big pharma and friends that it could be blamed on an invisible invader, the “virus”! At the time of the so-called Spanish Flu aspirin was being promoted by pharmaceutical companies as the latest “wonder drug.” Doctors were urged by big pharma to prescribe mega-doses of aspirin—which they eagerly did, with predictably deadly results. But, of course, that isn’t something they are teaching children today. What children learn about in school is a pandemic caused by big bad “virus” that only big pharma can rescue us from, despite the fact such an entity has never been proven to exist. During the time of the so-called Spanish Flu a team of doctors tried very hard to prove transmission of a virus and failed every time. They could not infect a single person with the so-called virus they still claim exists. But never mind that. Let’s keep blaming the virus. The poisoning programs initiated by the State and Big Pharma have nothing to do with what happened then. Aspirin poisoning was at a most a “contributor” to the deaths. The unproven virus was the real culprit! Let’s not lay too much blame on poor aspirin, despite the fact we know for certain aspirin poisoning was taking place on a massive scale at that time. Aspirin is, after all, “safe” if it is used properly (and it is such a profitable drug)!

But I must confess that I am not convinced there is a proper way to use poisons. No matter how we use a poison, it is never safe. There is no safe poison, and there is no safe dose of poison. There are just varying timelines for injury and death, depending on the amount of poison administered, the frequency of exposure, and the vulnerability of the patient exposed.

Do we need poison to get better? I don’t think so. There is no poison which the human body could ever be deficient in. There is no pharmaceutical drug it “lacks” and requires for health or survival. A person with osteoporosis does not a "Reclast deficiency." Quite the opposite. A person with osteoporosis is an extremely late stage of acidosis and has an urgent need to remove the toxic burden from his body. But the medical establishment will encourage him to poison himself even further by submitting to extremely toxic Reclast treatments. What are the results of such treatments on those who submit to them? I hope someone out there will investigate and let us know.

Let us not forget what the medical establishment desperately wants us to forget: the body is designed to repair itself. It is designed to survive. It knows very well what is good for it and what is bad for it. It immediately recognizes every drug as a threat to its survival. Listen to what the drug pushers say about their drugs to try to get you to take them. But then listen to what your body says to you about those drugs when you do take them. It is up to you to decide who you trust more: yourself or them.